Thursday, May 15, 2014
Summer Tour 2014 - Charlotte Andrews: 'Not your typical theatre-going experience'
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Have You Seen This Yet?
Does that sound like something you can get behind?
Help us spread the word by re-posting this link to your blog or Facebook page:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/grassroots/grassroots-shakespeare-summer-tour-2012
Click the link to learn more!
Monday, October 24, 2011
MACBETH--Company Bios
![]() |
Musician
WES TOLMAN
Witch/Murderer
Porter/Gentlewoman
Musician
Witch/Muderer
ALEX UNGERMAN
Co-Producer
LILY HYE SOO DIXON-GEELS
Lady MacDuff/Fleance/Doctor
LEVITICUS BROWN
Duncan/Siward
Thursday, August 25, 2011
The Grassroots ethos in action
How did that happen? We ALL won!
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
A peek inside the Grassroots audition process!
We all know what a typical audition entails; you walk onto a bare stage, introduce yourself to a vaguely discernible casting director sitting somewhere out in the fourth-wall ether, and then (if you're lucky) launch headlong into a monologue that you have spent weeks preparing. Almost immediately, you finish, head out the door, and await the results with baited breath for days, sometimes weeks. Grassroots auditions are... different.
From the very first moment of auditions, you are part of an ensemble. You're encouraged to give and take feedback from your fellow auditioners. You're urged to speak directly to them during your performance, and to notice and use the surrounding environment effectively. In some ways it's a bit daunting, trying to stand out and be heard in the middle of a vast park, and having your audition piece openly scrutinized by strangers. But in other ways, it can be quite satisfying to let the energy of an audience enliven your performance, and to foster a sense of community with your peers. Auditions are never easy, but Grassroots auditions are, at the very least, unique.
The most difficult, and perhaps the most important part of the Grassroots auditions, is the voting. After devising a few scenes in small groups, and performing them for each other, the recalled group of actors write up confidential ballots, listing the people they would most like to work with. After that, a simple tally determines the company. For those who, for whatever reason, don't make the final cut, it can be pretty disappointing. But those who do make the company find an instant network of supportive, trusting, enthusiastic friends, each of whom are there because of each other's votes.
The instant bond created by this exciting, if harrowing process, allows us to jump straight into rehearsals. And for Grassroots, that's an absolute necessity. We only have ten days, after all. There's no time for trust-falls or bridge-building. The connections have to be there from day one. If we're trying to approach Shakespeare the way his original players did, then we need an incredibly cohesive, tight-knit group, like they had. So, although it can be dispiriting for those who feel rejected by the voting (and the difference between total validation and total rejection is often just a single vote), it is incredibly beneficial to the creation of an enthusiastic and sincerely collaborative ensemble.
If you like what we do, please help us by sharing with your friends and family! In England, follow us at Grassroots Shakespeare · London on facebook, or @grassroots_lon on twitter. Our upcoming production of A Midsummer Night's Dream promises to be a surprising and enchanting event!
Sunday, July 24, 2011
The First Blog Post of the New Grassroots British Shakespeare Company
The First Blog Post of the New Grassroots British Shakespeare Company
It’s been an interesting road to get to this point. I’ve never gone through an audition process quite like this: so relaxed, open. From the instant we all met, the method seemed almost designed to make us into a company. Performing monologues in front of each other was an audition experience I’d had only once before, auditioning for drama school (at the end of which, I got in). It’s amazing the difference it makes to your performance to have a supportive audience. Nerves melt away with the laughter or rapt attention that accompanies the performance. By the end of the day, I felt like I knew everyone and they al l knew me. There was no worry about who would get in and who wouldn’t because we all felt we’d been given an equal opportunity. We knew that no matter what, whoever made up the company would be talented and fun to work with.
I could talk about the recall but I would basically be repeating myself: the exact same enjoyable experience except with fewer people. By the end of it, however, there was an excitement: only thirteen of us could make it and every one of us (you could tell) desperately wanted to get in. Not just to act but because it would be so much fun to act with these people.
And so it was with much joy that I discovered I was to be part of the group. Additionally, I would be fulfilling a life long dream of mine: to perform Shakespeare in London in the open as Shakespeare intended. From a very young age, I have enjoyed Shakespeare’s work and wanted to perform it in the country of its origin. That’s why I went to drama school here and it is the reason I decided to start my acting career here. A year out of drama school, doing mostly film work, I am now back doing what I love - Shakespeare’s theatre - and I cannot think of a better company with which to start.
We had our first meeting as a company last week and it felt like I was meeting old friends. We all indicated openly the roles we wanted to play and quite naturally it seemed that everybody got what they wanted.
So as I eagerly embark on our first week of rehearsals, I am full of confidence, not just in myself but in the whole group. I already feel trust in every actor and that together we will create something truly amazing.
Aaron Tavaler
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
2011 London Company Announced!
Oberon/ Thesus - Noah Young
Titania/ Hyppolita - Ponder Goddard
Lysander - Eve Winters
Demetrius - Harrie Hayes
Helena - Jennifer Dawn Williams
Hermia - Sarah Jayne-Harris
Bottom - Aaron Travaler
Quince - Grace Kennedy
Snout - Liam Webster
Starveling - Siobhan Daly
Snug/ Egeus - Cornelia Baumann
Flute - Mark Oram
Puck/ Philostrate - Holly Davies
Keep reading over the coming weeks to learn more about this wonderful troupe of actors! They are delightful, talented, and a bit mad - they're London's first Grassrooters!
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
TRIPLE HEADER: Summer Tour 2011 Finale!
Castle Amphitheatre 1300 E Center St. Provo
Monday, June 27th
8:30pm 'Midsummer Night's Dream: All-Male Cast'
9:45pm 'Romeo and Juliet: Encore'
$7 for all three!
$5 for one or two!
Friday, June 10, 2011
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
FULL TOURING SCHEDULE
TRIPLE HEADER!
7:00pm-'As You Like It'
8:30pm-'A Midsummer Night's Dream'
9:45pm-'Romeo and Juliet'
Castle Amphitheatre Provo
(Ticketed Show)
Check out the events on Facebook:
'As You Like It': http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=187577517959272
'A Midsummer Night's Dream': https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=217717948250120
'Romeo and Juliet': https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=101617536597681
Monday, May 30, 2011
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Day 1: As You Like It
When we first started this crazy experiment that has become the Grassroots Shakespeare Company we took to the free and open space of the public parks out of necessity--we had nowhere else to rehearse and nowhere else to perform, but now we embrace the advantages of public spaces by choice.
We arrived at the park to discover that there was some sort of volleyball tournament happening with two or three volleyball courts set-up all around our usual rehearsal spot.
No matter. We unpacked our set and with volleyball games happening on either side of us, we got down to business blocking our show.
The rehearsal went pretty smoothly, and although we're still in the mode of remembering and rediscovering our old process, we fell into a nice rhythm by the end of the night that we can only hope will continue.
We were also graced by Master Christopher Clark--without whom we would not exist and who has done much to support our company. Chris taught us a bawdy 3/4 jig that we're sure you'll find to be rollicking good fun. (provided we ever get the sequence down)
Between dodging stray volleyballs and the unfortunate dimness after sunset caused by loss of one of our worklights, we managed to make pretty good progess: Our script has been cut down to a lean 75 pages, and we almost met our goal of blocking through 25, but had to end at 22.
Perhaps by the end of May we'll have improved both our diction and our return serves!
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
2011 Summer Touring Shows
We're going to assemble two shows in May and perform them in Rep throughout June.
On top of that, we'll be attempting a remount of last year's production of Romeo and Juliet.
It's going to be a whirlwind ride and there's always the distinct possibility of epic failure.
Our season isn't determined by an artistic director, a producer, or even a director. Our shows are picked by the company who will perform them. That's our philosophy--get the right people on board first, and it doesn't matter so much what show you end up doing, because you'll already have a talented and committed group of artists ready to tackle just about anything.
Last week we assembled our company in a most unusual manner. We let everyone who attended callbacks vote on who they thought should join the company.
Earlier this week, we met for the first time as an ensemble and voted on which shows we should produce.
There were a lot of great suggestions and even more good arguments:
The Main Show
We've got nine men and five women in the company this year. We decided that the main show should offer ample opportunity for the women to showcase their talents, as the Second Show we're doing will, in the spirit of true original practices, feature an all-male cast.
We threw around a lot of titles, but the main contenders were:
The Winter's Tale
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Twelfth Night
As You Like It
Hamlet
As Hamlet offers few parts for women, it was out of the running almost immediately. We gradually narrowed it down to Winter's Tale, Midsummer, and As You Like It, and after much deliberation on the merits of each work, settled on As You Like It for it's accessibility, broad appeal, numerous female roles, and strong ensemble characters.
The Second Show
This is new territory for Grassroots. We've never done an all-male show before, and carefully weighed the pros and cons of each possible title. Those most in the running were:
Hamlet
Taming of the Shrew
Twelfth Night
Merry Wives of Windsor
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Macbeth
Hamlet and Macbeth both offered the possibility of strong dramatic female roles. Taming of the Shrew and Merry Wives of Windsor both came with the added bonus of advertising a show with references to women in the title--who would be played by men! Twelfth Night carried the fantastic challenge of a man playing a woman playing an man and the comic confusion that audiences both modern and Elizabethan would have delighted in. After talking things over, the vote came down between Merry Wives and Midsummer: Merry Wives being a strong choice for lovable Falstaff and the intrigue of seeing Mistress Ford and Mistress Quickly being played by men, and Midsummer offering accessibility and stronger name recognition.
In the end we went with Midsummer because it will resonate with audiences who have likely seen it before and will be familiar with the story, but in a new way--as we will wager that few have seen it staged with an all male cast.
The Remount
Of all our plans, this one will likely be the most challenging to pull off. We'll have to work hard to get as many of our former company members together again for a short rehearsal process--perhaps only 2 or 3 evenings. And this will be on top of an already crammed schedule. All the same, we're going to go for it! Hold us to it!
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Taking Risks: Open Auditions and Trusting the Crowd
Actors in Shakespeare's day were able to put on ten or more different plays in the space of two weeks. There are several factors that could have made this possible:
1. They had a large volume of plays in their repertoire--and while they rarely performed the same title on two consecutive days, (Or even in the same week) they did on occasion resurrect a popular popular show for an encore performance.
2. The actors consistently played similar types. We know that Will Kemp played such foolish clowns as Dogberry in Much Ado, Peter in R and J, and Launcelot Gobbo in Merchant, while Richard Burbage was known for playing strong leads such as Othello, Richard III, Hamlet, and Lear. If an actor was accustomed to playing a specific type, it would have required much less time and effort for him to learn and develop the part.
3. The actors worked under a company system, and were used to working closely and cooperatively with one another. They must have had an enormous trust and confidence in one another's abilities in order to produce with the speed they did and under the rigorous conditions they worked in.
What does this mean for Grassroots?
Well to begin with, we do not have a large repertoire, but we will be attempting to remount last year's production of Romeo and Juliet in the spirit of those early companies.
Second, we will be casting our shows democratically--which tends to favor and encourage the sort of type casting that would have been prevalent in Shakespeare's day. More on that in another post.
Third, while we do our best to work under a company system, our track record thus far has been less than ideal. At the beginning of our second year, we had only two of our original twelve company members return for our second season. This year is a little better: We have six of last year's thirteen coming back for another season.
Our first two companies were hand-picked by the producers. This was done in an attempt to ensure that we were getting actors who were not only talented, but had somewhat of a history working together.
This year, in an effort to be more open and inclusive of all hoping to join the company, we held our first ever open auditions. This is a huge risk for us, as speed of rehearsal and production is of the utmost importance for us.
We've planned just ten short rehearsals for each of our new shows this Summer.
How will we beat the steep learning curve that accompanies the rehearsal process for actors unaccustomed to working with one another?
We've decided to take a bold risk in a gambit to build maximum company solidarity in the shortest possible amount of time.
Open Auditions and Callbacks
We held our open auditions and were pleasantly surprised by the volume of interest from the community. We ended up inviting back about twenty-eight people for callbacks.
Here's where things get interesting:
Many of our former company members were among those who auditioned and were invited to callbacks. No one got a free pass. This year instead of inviting everyone back, we invited back no one. Everyone, including former company members had to prove themselves valuable and committed to the group.
Callbacks were full of great energy and competitive talent right from the start.
We were interested in seeing how well people could work together under limited time, so we randomly divided into groups and gave each one a copy of Sonnet 29 and allotted ten minutes of rehearsal to develop the text into some sort of performance.
Some groups focused on choral reading and movement. Other groups divided up the lines and worked on characterization. Each piece was unique and fascinating to watch. Things were off to a great start.
We then switched gears to give every individual present a chance to show their stuff.
Each participant got one minute to perform a Shakespearean monologue we had asked them to come prepared with. Then the entire crowd gave feedback: everyone raised their hands and the person performing was allowed to choose three people to deliver feedback or suggestions. After hearing suggestions, the performer was given thirty seconds to incorporate the suggestions in performance. It was fast-paced, energetic and full of creative choices on the parts of both performers and crowd. We saw some of the most entertaining and colorful performances I've ever seen in a callback. Everyone was given the chance to shine and most did so in a way that delighted and surprised all present.
The Vote
Then came the hard part. Everyone had performed and seen every performance. It was all out on the table. There was no director there to impress or perform for, and no committee to make the decisions. At this point, we passed out ballots to all the performers present at callbacks and instructed them to vote for the ten individuals who gave the strongest performances and worked best with the group.
The Talley
As we collected ballots, I thought: "I've been a part of this company for two years now. What if I get voted out?"
And that was both terrifying and exhilarating. All the members of the board had agreed that this was the system we would use to determine the company, and no one would be given special treatment.
It was an agonizing evening as we all waited for the results to be calculated.
Finally, when all the numbers were added, we had some pretty definitive results. Most of our former company members who auditioned made the cut, but we did lose one, and that was painful. But there's also a huge payoff here. Everyone who made the company made it because they were voted in, and there's a sense of gravity to that. There's also an automatic sense of camaraderie because when it comes down to it, I'm here because you voted for me, and you're here because I voted for you. There's no director or producer to owe, only a sense of collective obligation and respect for one another from the responsibility that comes from mutual selection.
The Payoff
So when does the payoff come? Well we sat down and had our first company meeting this week, and it went better than planned. There's already a great chemistry and excitement in the group that we can only hope will endure and increase.
But at the end of the day, the payoff can only truly be measured by the quality of our product. If our company puts on a good show, then and only then can we know that we're a good company.































